“Do You Know Any Good Publishers?”
About two years ago I was sitting around “writing” (i.e.
“reading articles about writing”), and I came across an interview with a
traditionally published author. I didn’t know who he was exactly, and I
certainly don’t remember him now, but he was fairly successful as a novelist
and in the most accepted sense of the word.
He told a story about an aspiring author’s comment during
a book signing. The man came up to him, tapped on his book, and asked, “How
much did this cost you to make?”
The author said, astonished, “Not a thing.”
This was the first time I had heard the belief authors were
supposed to pay to be published. At the moment, I was really surprised. Yet, with
actual statements like, “I’m going into self-publishing because I don’t have
the time, energy, or money to do it traditionally,” getting round the internet
pretty frequently, it has started to become apparent to me that it is a fairly
common thought.
The publisher finances the project. That’s the reason an
author would agree to share his profits.
Which is why I wonder what these potential writers think
a publisher does, and why I don’t know how to answer the most typical request
on any writer’s forum, “Do you guys know any good publishers?”
That depends on what is meant by “publisher.”
Some people mean self-publisher, some people mean
traditional publisher, and some don’t know the difference. Despite the
repetitiveness of the question, this unfamiliarity with the publishing process
remains, this is the reason behind so many successful scams, and is why so many
people get burned.
Publishing is just like any other business. You have the
guy with the money who pays the people with the skills. He gets to decide who
he hires, and he looks at a resume (query letter) and a portfolio (the
manuscript). The only real difference is that, one, the author has already done
the work, and, two, it’s the author’s brainchild instead of the guy with the
bank account.
So the power therein is a little unclear. The publisher
works sort of like an investor as well as a boss, the author is expected to
take a good amount of personal investment and opinion into the scene, and
instead of it being majorly the boss’s name on the line, it’s the artist’s.
Sure, HarperCollins looks a little bad when producing a terrible book, but most
people won’t even know who the publisher was. John Smith is the idiot who
thought it was a good idea.
(Not that Mr. Smith could ever been an idiot.)
The symbiotic relationship between traditional publisher
and author works like this:
The publisher puts up the money so the broke author
doesn’t have to. If the project fails, the publisher is the only one
financially affected. But in return for this risk, if the project succeeds, the
publisher gets the profits, paying the author with royalties.
The publisher has more resources; they can buy the books
in far higher bulk and thus have cheaper costs, they have a working
relationship with bookstores and so can get their novels on shelves easier and
book signings faster, and they have a better reputation which, in this business,
means a lot. No one is looking for typos because they assume there won’t be
any. They are experienced in the commercial aspects of novels. Each person in
the company has made a lot of their mistakes already and learned from them,
warned each other about them, and developed a system to prevent them from
happening. They have a good sense as to what works and what doesn’t. The
publisher tackles the writing world from the financial angle which allows the
author to focus on the artistic one.
The symbiotic relationship between the publisher and the
author in self-publishing:
They are the same person.
Self-publishing is exactly what it sounds like. The author, instead of turning to a company for investment, fronts the financial side of it by himself. This allows him to have complete control over his own project and reap all the rewards. But it means that he is on his own.
The self-publisher does not have a good reputation.
Currently (and that must be emphasized because the literary world is changing
fairly fast), the majority of people see the self-publisher as the “I needed
the instant and guaranteed gratification for my work that self-publishing
supplies, and am too lazy and/or arrogant to get a ‘real’ book, and so slapped
whatever unedited crap I spewed onto paper on the internet and expect destiny
to take over from there.”
Of course, this isn’t necessarily the case, and I’m not
trying to dissuade anyone who is interested in this avenue. I’ve read many good
self-published books. But, to be fair, I have read a lot more terrible ones. Or, at least, started to.
My point is that, while there are a lot of reasons and
benefits to self-publishing, before an author takes that route, he can’t be
disillusioned about how people are going to see him. As A.A. says, the first
step to solving a problem is by admitting there is one.
Self-publishing is that it is just like starting your own
business. If a writer is not good with business or marketing, or very
inexperienced, he needs to consider that before trying to start his career in
this way.
Can you get people to friend you on Facebook? Follow you
on Twitter? When you were selling candy bars for girl scouts/boy
scouts/sports/school electives, did you do a good job? Did you hate it beyond
all belief? Have you promoted and produced any sort of smaller projects before?
How did those go? Do you have enough money to pay for advertising? Do you know
how books are advertised? Have you ever tried to make money via self-employed
means before?
Because of the current stigma, an author who has
self-published a book that was not a surprising success now has a black mark on
his career. Publishers aren’t impressed by this action, and worse, they tend to
believe you’re going to be harder to work with (see above perception), and if
you don’t provide the name of the publisher in your query, they’re going to
think (know) that any “published” book is just self made. If you don’t mention
it at all and they look you up on the internet and see it, they’ll be annoyed
that you didn’t talk about it. (I’ve heard agents complain about this.) This
leads to very limited options in terms of proper etiquette when trying to
switch back to the traditional route.
This is to say there are reasons not to do self-publish
if you’re not prepared to make it successful. Considering how many times I’ve
read a blog that said, “I was just going to put my book up on the internet and
let whatever happen happen,” I know it’s not uncommon for authors to never have
any intention on putting in the effort.
Self-publishing isn’t easier. It’s just that the hard
work comes when the book is already out.
Authors who want to be traditionally published have every
reason to go for that route first. Many self-published writers didn’t bother
with it, for various motives, and turned straight for the guarantee. Make sure
that the publishers really are a bunch of tasteless suits before assuming that
they’re not going to like what you wrote. They very well might like it, and
there’s a lot of benefit to having financial back than having control and no
support. Traditional publishing may be the worst route for an artistic and
financial genius, but it allows for skill compensation for us without both.
If your goal is, however, to just have a book in your
hands and not have a long standing career (which really is some people’s), then
we can turn our heads to the vanity press. This is a publishing company that,
by means of the print-on-demand option, will (as an unsaid rule) accept pretty
much anyone and make a printed book available to the public online. They aren’t
actually created until someone orders them, so the press isn’t out any money.
The problem with vanity presses is that they are poorly
edited, (I believe not at all), and very expensive compared to other books.
That’s how they make their money. They get authors to buy the novels themselves
(sometimes in a hostile, manipulative manner), and some from their families,
and then, by sheer bulk of the creations, create a profit that way.
This is great if you don’t care about getting readers or
them in bookstores. It is a perfect way to have your story in tangible form for
twenty bucks. If that’s someone’s goal, (and only goal) I actually would
recommend it.
Or, you could actually go the self-publishing route, have
them offer the book on print-on-demand, and buy one of your own for a couple of
bucks.
In this day and age, it is really easy to get a book
available without paying a dime (a singular
book). This is important to remember. If your goal is just to have one or a few
copies of a story, then you can do it by paying for the books themselves and
don’t need to put in thousands of dollars.
All an author needs to understand about a self-publishing
company is:
They are a printer
not actually a publisher. All they are doing is creating a tangible product you
paid them to make.
Some will offer more services as well as printing. This
is not necessarily a scam, but the author is still in charge. First, he should
have the right to only pay for printing. They might advertise that they have
great graphic design artists for the cover, that they have great editors to
look through the book, and, in all honesty, this is might be true. But because
it’s the writer’s money, he needs to be and to be able to be the responsible
one. Before paying for any of this, he should know who’s doing it and what type
of work she does. He should also be able to bring in his own artists. If the
company says, “Ours or nothing,” or especially, “You must pay for a graphic
designer/editor before we will print anything,” it’s a scam and you can get a
better deal through other companies. There are too many options to put up with
this.
Lastly, and this is the most important part, a
self-publishing company should work by commission OR by an upfront charge, but not both. Anyone ever asking for both
is definitely a scam. Either the company charges you for printing/specific services (in which you know
exactly what those services are), and then you’re on your own, or they don’t
charge you anything, but get a percentage after
a book has sold.
Simply:
You pay for hard copies. They print those hard copies (in
the exact form you have given them) and send all of them to you. The price
should be low enough that you can sell them to others for the same amount an
average, traditionally published book would go for. Then the company has no
investment if the book sells or not. They do not edit, market, or design the novel
for you. They take the product as is, no acceptance or rejection involved.
(Avoid any self-publishers that have a submissions process.)
OR
You pay nothing. They offer print-on-demand and ebooks
online. When someone purchase the copy, (say for $10), they keep a percentage
($2 to $4) and you get the rest ($8 to $6). You should be able to buy your own
books for their “percentage” price ($2 to $4), not the retail price ($10). (In
this case of not paying anything, it’s because you have also designed and
edited it yourself instead of hiring someone.) They do not edit, market, or
design the book for you.
Maybe you added some extra services that they offer:
You pay $300 (for example) for a cover design. You pay
$3,000 for an editor. You hire a P.R. agent to do the marketing. You need to
include those in your cost of books and consider how much you’d need to charge
to make that money back. If it gets ridiculous, do some research for what’s
normal.
But you never, ever pay for a Printing Fee, a Reading
Fee, Marketing Fee, or any extraneous/ambiguous price. You should know exactly
what you are getting out of your money, and how much you should be spending on
that service. You are paying to get something very specific back, and not
paying for their “time” or “consideration.” It should make clear sense as to
what the purchased service is. You should be able to opt out of the other
options as well/bring in your own artists. You should not be pressured into
buying your own books. If they mix traditional publishing with self-publishing,
it’s a scam. Luckily, they will advertise it like it’s a good thing. Lastly,
the services should be a separate distinction from the printing process. You
pay for the service one at a time, and should never be pressured into doing
something faster. If you pay for editing, they shouldn’t be charging you for
printing. You pay the editor, she edits. You wait as long as you want. You pay
for printing (maybe with a different company even), you get the physical books.
You should not have to pay for the printing of ebooks.
If you are looking for graphic designers and editors, I
recommend working outside the self-publishing company and seeking freelancers.
You have more control and more personability that way, and are less likely to
be pulled into some sort of money grabbing scam.
The publishing world is changing quickly, and as time
goes on, the more self-publishing becomes acceptable. But with more and more
authors producing their own work, the more there are people able to collect on
our dreams. There’s nothing wrong with self-publishing; it’s just important to
understand it first, and realize that it’s the choice, not the norm.
So as to the question, “Do you know any good publishers?”
the answers are…
If you are looking for a traditional one, you probably want
an agent, not a publisher. For those, look in the current Writer’s Market and the acknowledgement section of books in your
genre (most authors thank them.) Most
publishers do not take anything without an agent, which is why they are usually
your first step. And many of them get furious at receiving unsolicited work. If
you really want actual publishers, all books have theirs listed in the
copyright page. Writer’s Market also
has some that will take unagented work.
If you are looking for a self-publisher, CreateSpace
works great for paperbacks and ebooks. They have good spines and look great
(depending on the cover given). I have heard that Lulu has nice products and
more options, like hard cover (also are a little more expensive). IUniverse is
a scam, Publish America is a vanity press. Do a Google search if you’re unsure
about any company.