Treat Yourself How Others Should Treat You
The best advice I’ve ever heard was not from a writer, but
from a cartoon artist. Though I have never seen Phil McAndrew’s work outside
his blog, “Super Obvious Secrets That I Wish They’d Teach in Art School,” has
stuck with me ever since the first time I Stumbled upon it.
Most of it is pretty accurate and fairly well told. Things
like draw every day and be nice to people are good but common pieces of advice
he explains in a readable way. But the unique and interesting singular suggestion
that really hit me was number eight on the list: “Don’t trash talk yourself.”
He explains:
“Why would you expect
someone else to take your work seriously when even you, the person who created
it, are openly talking about how much it sucks?”
Whenever I repeat this advice, however, I get the same,
horrified response, “I wasn’t trashing myself.”
Which is part of the problem. We are so accustomed to defending
ourselves through pre-emptive self-attacks that half the time we aren’t even
realizing we’re doing it. Statements like “I wrote a couple of crappy young
adult novels before writing the rough draft,” “That’s probably why I’ll never
have a super popular blog will millions of followers,” and “I just hit 30k on
my new project and didn’t completely hate it!” all count. It is easy to see why
someone might think it doesn’t because they’re just telling the truth.
But note: all of these statements were uttered by the same woman, Jill Hathaway, the author of Slide. When I first read her interview
in Writer’s Digest, I found myself
growing more disenchanted with her in each and every answer. To be fair, I didn’t
find the article with knowledge of her or her book, and after moving on to her
blog, I still have no idea what it is about.
Skimming through her blogs, I couldn’t find one that didn’t
have some sort of defensive statement, whether it be her inclination to explain
that “You gotta read it, y’all,” isn’t grammatically correct, or just talking
about how her book required so many
rewrites.
Here’s the thing - She sounds like a nice person. She isn’t
condescending and clearly not egocentric, she’s honest and to the point, and as
a person I can admire her openness. As a writer, I get the distinct idea that
she doesn’t think she knows what she’s doing.
A fan commented on her blog asking her about the title. Her
response? “Uh…”
Why respond at all? If I had been that fan, interested
enough to find her webpage and ask about her book and gotten that answer, I
would have been offended. It feels as though she is saying, “That’s a stupid
question!” Worse, it sounds like she has no answers, as if she hasn’t put any
thought into it.
I bring this up not to give her bad P.R. I don’t actually
believe that insecurity reflects on the novel’s quality. I haven’t read Slide, and I can’t critique it. I’m talking
about this because I have no intention
on reading it.
This woman had my attention for more than I could ask of a
total stranger, and she did not intrigue me into even sampling her book. And it
wasn’t as though there weren’t opportunities. The interviewer asked her what
novel was about and she gave this uninspired one word answer. She spent more
time explaining about her crappy other books than she did about this new one.
The commenter gave her the option to plug her story inside her own blog by
asking about it, and she just gave him a grunt.
And it’s not as though this is an uncommon mistake. In the
last week, I’d read two other interviews that were tainted by this problem. One
was by a standup comedian who kept talking about project that went wrong, but
not telling us how, just repeating, “I wasn’t prepared.”
The point of interviews is to give information. I’m reading
it to hear about these people, and when they answer questions succinctly, or
worse, play a politicians game of nonanswers, the interview is boring, and you’ve
done nothing to advertise yourself.
Lastly, a good question for authors to ask themselves is “Why
is my fantasy better than yours?” Why do people read books when they can have a
story to themselves that they control and isn’t limited by standards of
protocol or expectations of readers. The answer is because it’s better thought
out. The author knows more about his world than the average daydreamer does. An
author’s fantasy has continuity, gravity, and realism, and does the hard work
so that the reader doesn’t have to. Which means that when the reader doesn’t
believe that the author knows what he’s doing and has put more thought into the
world than she has in the shower, she’s not going to bother read anything he’s
written. And what leads the reader to think the book’s fantasy isn’t more
intelligent than her temporary one? The author indicating that he isn’t sure of
anything either.
We all are insecure. On the rise to success, few of us see
ourselves as experts. American society likes to see the successful as a
different sort of being, a person who has it easy, a person who is meant to do
great things and thus never questions if he can. But that creature doesn’t
exist, which means that no matter if you are Stephan King, Gandhi, or the pope,
you’re going to question yourself. The trick is to pretend like you don’t and
keep your insecurities to yourself until you can say it in a funny and
light-hearted manner – see any article in Hyperbole and a Half.